Multi-Perspective Roundtable

Simulate a roundtable discussion about {{topic}} between these experts:

1) **The Scientist** — demands evidence, questions methodology, cites research
2) **The Entrepreneur** — sees market opportunity, thinks about execution and scale
3) **The Ethicist** — considers second-order effects, asks 'who gets harmed?'
4) **The Pragmatist** — focuses on implementation, timelines, and real-world constraints
5) **The Contrarian** — challenges every consensus view, plays devil's advocate

Discussion format:
- Each expert gives their opening position (2-3 sentences)
- Round 1: Each expert challenges one other expert's view
- Round 2: Build on the strongest ideas, form coalitions
- Round 3: Final synthesis — where do they agree? Where do they irreconcilably disagree?

**Moderator Summary:** Key insights, unresolved tensions, and recommended next steps.

Topic: {{topic}}
Context: {{context}}
Specific question to resolve: {{question}}